Objective:To analyze the changes in the clinical use structure of proton pump inhibitors for injection before and after the implementation of the “national-centralized drug procurement” and “national medical insurance negotiation” policies in Zhengzhou Second People’s Hospital, and to explore the potential drug use problems in the process of implementation of the “national-centralized drug procurement” and “national medical insurance negotiation” policies, so as to provide reference for promoting rational clinical use of drugs and optimizing policy implementation. Methods:The usage data of injectable proton pump inhibitors from 2019 to 2024 were extracted from the hospital drug usage database, the variations in key indicators, including the defined daily dose (DDDs) and its usage proportion, as well as the defined daily cost (DDDc) and the proportion of usage amount, specifically for injectable proton pump inhibitors were analyzed and compared. Results:Under the influence of the “national-centralized drug procurement” and “national medical insurance negotiation” policies, the use structure of injectable proton pump inhibitors in our hospital has undergone major changes, and unselected drugs have gradually been withdrawn from the hospital catalog. After 2023, the use of injectable proton pump inhibitors in our hospital were only selected drugs, temporary harvest varieties and “national medical insurance negotiation” varieties left. Among the selected drugs, [national-centralized drug procurement] Omeprazole B for injection DDDs and the proportion of usage are increasing year by year, but they account for a smaller proportion; [national-centralized drug procurement] Lansoprazole for Injection DDDs will be on the rise from 2022 to 2023, but due to the small tendency for clinical use, they will basically no longer be used in 2024; [national-centralized drug procurement] the proportion of DDDs and usage of pantoprazole for injection is increasing. In 2024, the proportion of DDDs and usage of pantoprazole ranks first in the hospital. The DDDs of the “national medical insurance negotiation” variety of iprazole for injection showed an increasing trend year by year from 2020 to 2023. After hospital control, the proportion of DDDs and usage has declined, but still accounts for a large proportion. Conclusion:The “national-centralized drug procurement” and “national medical insurance negotiation” policies have lowered the price of injectable PPIs, reduced patients’ medication burden, increased the accessibility of drugs, and saved a large amount of medical insurance funds. However, they have also derived some potential medication behaviors, only by strengthening the supervision of drug use can we ensure the rational use of drugs and promote the stable and long-term implementation of favorable policies.
Jia Xuesong
,
Wang Juan
,
Wang Mengyuan
,
Zhang Yingjie
. Analysis of Structural Changes in the Use of Injectable Proton Pump Inhibitors and Potential Drug Use Problems in Zhengzhou Second People’s Hospital under the Influence of “National-centralized Drug Procurement” and “National Medical Insurance Negotiation” Policies[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Affairs, 2025
, 39(6)
: 717
-724
.
DOI: 10.16153/j.1002-7777.2025-02-0006
[1] 国家卫生健康委办公厅.国家卫生健康委办公厅关于印发质子泵抑制剂临床应用指导原则(2020年版)的通知:国卫办医函〔2020〕973号[EB/OL].(2020-12-09)[2025-01-15].http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7659/202012/9aac2b191c844082aac2df73b820948f.shtml.
[2] 王梦雷,陆伟,陈红斗,等.国家组织集中采购质子泵抑制剂在全国范围医疗机构中的可及性调查研究[J].中国医院药学杂志,2024,44(19):2274-2280.
[3] 张倩倩,赵亮,刘云娇,等. 2018—2022年全国医药信息网样本医院质子泵抑制剂使用情况分析[J].中国医院用药评价与分析,2024,24(8):1003-1006.
[4] 陈新谦,金有豫,汤光.新编药物学[M].第18版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2018:545-548.
[5] 谢丽平,郭瞬萍,陈侃.某三甲医院门急诊质子泵抑制剂临床应用分析[J].海峡药学,2019,31(3):248-250.
[6] 任雷涛,王之舟,罗巧,等.国家集采前后某院注射用PPI使用情况分析[J].中国药业,2023,32(10):24-27.
[7] 伍珊珊. 质子泵抑制剂使用情况及用药合理性分析[J].临床合理用药,2023,16(7):132-135,138.
[8] 成华,张晓兰,陈世财,等. 2016至2018年我院住院患者质子泵抑制剂应用分析[J].河北医药,2021,43(8):1258-1261.
[9] 耿娟,金亮,刘汉顺,等.合肥-安庆联盟地区药品集中带量采购政策对某院质子泵抑制剂临床应用的影响[J].中国药业,2023,32(10):28-31.
[10] 汪江涛,丁伯平,魏成成,等.药品带量采购对芜湖市中医医院质子泵抑制剂使用的影响[J].现代药物与临床,2022,37(7):1603-1611.
[11] 杨欢,董宪喆,徐忆纯,等.带量采购政策下口服质子泵抑制剂在宣武医院的应用分析[J].中国药事,2024,38(5):594-602.
[12] 李兆申,杨云生,张澍田,等.泮托拉唑治疗消化性溃疡出血的专家意见[J].中华消化杂志,2011,31(10):712-713.
[13] 孔宪彬,任永慧,孔宪彩.泮托拉唑的不良反应及与其他药物的相互作用[J].中国实用医药,2023,18(17):133-135.
[14] 彭靖,赵颖,刘继强,等.“4+7”带量采购对质子泵抑制剂注射剂型临床用药的影响[J].临床合理用药,2024,17(35):180-183.
[15] 国家医疗保障局.国家卫生健康委关于适应国家医保谈判常态化持续做好谈判药品落地工作的通知[EB/OL].(2021-09-09)[2025-01-15].https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-09/11/content_5636762.htm.
[16] 庞立峰,华素.静脉用质子泵抑制剂使用合理性分析及院内管控[J].上海医药,2024,45(3):25-27,54.
[17] 林智娟,刘立,贺文娟,等.武汉33家医院执行质子泵抑制剂集采政策的效果评估[J].中国现代应用药学,2024,41(12):1723-1728.
[18] 付南思,陈钦榜,彭菲,等.临床药师信息化集成管理对促进全院质子泵抑制剂合理使用的干预成效[J].中国处方药,2024,22(11):45-48.