目的：为解决现阶段食品药品领域行刑衔接案件办理的低效与混乱，进一步探索能够在全国广泛推广的操作模式。方法：通过查阅相关文献资料，并结合现有模式，进一步系统梳理地方代表性操作模式，从中提炼能在全国推广的衔接程序。结果：坚持"食药+公安"的紧密协作机制，推进"两法衔接"信息平台系统建设，针对重大、复杂、疑难的案件专门成立专家委员会论证的综合办案模式可以保障案件的有效办理。结论：可以尝试探索在全国范围内推广这种综合模式，从而形成打击食品药品领域犯罪的长效机制。
Objective:To solve the problems of inefficiencies and chaos in the current executions in the field of food and drug and to further explore the operation modes that can be widely promoted throughout the country. Methods:Relevant literatures were reviewed, and the local representative operation modes were systematically analyzed combined with the existing modes so as to extract the convergence procedure that can be promoted nationwide. Results:The "food and drug + public security" cooperation mechanism was adhered to, the construction of the "convergence of the two laws" information platform system was enhanced, and a comprehensive case handling mode was suggested by expert committee for major, complex and difficult cases in order to guarantee efficiency of executions. Conclusion:Promotion of the comprehensive mode nationwide should be explored so as to establish a long-term mechanism to suppress crimes in the field of food and drug.
[1] 刘政文. 药品行政执法与刑事司法衔接问题研究[D]. 海口:海南大学,2016:20.
[2] 省农委农产品质量安全监管处.海南省率先推行行刑衔接新模式强化食品安全监管[J]. 吉林农业,2015, (8):26-27.
[3] 马萍,陈银江. 吉林出台食品药品行政执法与刑事司法衔接实施细则[N]. 中国食品安全报,2017-03-09(B02).
[4] 周江,曾于生,银秋华. 对当前食品安全犯罪的调查分析——以新昌县"毒胶囊事件"为例[J]. 法治研究, 2014,(3):94-105.
[5] 赵国强. 澳门刑法研究[M]. 广州:广东人民出版社, 2009:46.
[6] 程虹. 湖南省四部门联合打击食药领域违法犯罪[J]. 食品安全导刊,2014,(92):56-57.
[7] 甄贞,申飞飞. 行政执法与刑事司法衔接机制刍议[J]. 人民检察,2011,(15):51-54.
[8] 李辰星. 行政执法与刑事司法衔接机制研究[D]. 武汉:武汉大学,2013:4.
[9] 张伟峰,俞海源. 陕西强化食品药品行政执法与刑事司法衔接工作[N]. 中国医药报,2017-03-02(001).
[10] 杨彬,邵蓉. 我国假药案件查处过程中行刑衔接问题探讨[J]. 中国药事,2012,(10):1057-1059.
[11] 丁锦希,邓媚,李伟. 我国行刑联动信息共享平台运行绩效量化评价[J]. 中国卫生法制,2012,(2):4-11.
[12] 中共中央关于深化党和国家机构改革的决定[N]. 人民日报,2018-03-05(001).
[13] 慕平. 法律监督机制新探索[M]. 北京:法律出版社, 2010:3.
[14] 戴玉忠,刘明祥. 犯罪与行政违法行为的界限及惩罚机制的协调[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2008:289.
[15] 胡肖华,吴彬彬. 检察机关在行刑衔接程序中的功能定位[J]. 湖南社会科学,2017,(1):61-67.
