目的: 对5批进口紫草的质量进行比较研究,为进口紫草的质量评价提供参考依据。方法: 分别对5批进口紫草性状进行对比;采用高效液相色谱法,Venusil MP C18(4.6 mm×250 mm,5 μm)色谱柱,以乙腈-0.05%甲酸水溶液(70 ∶ 30)为流动相,检测波长275 nm,柱温30 ℃,流速1.0 mL · min-1,对5批进口紫草中乙酰紫草素、异丁酰紫草素、β,β’-二甲基丙烯酰阿卡宁和异戊酰紫草素4个成分进行含量测定。结果: 5批进口紫草在性状上存在较大差异;乙酰紫草素、异丁酰紫草素、β,β’-二甲基丙烯酰阿卡宁、异戊酰紫草素进样量分别在0.2024~2.024 μg(r=1)、0.04072~0.4072 μg(r=0.9998)、0.2062~2.062 μg(r=1)、0.2678~2.678 μg(r=1)范围内呈现良好线性关系;平均加样回收率101.2%~104.1%,RSD<2.4%;不同批次的进口紫草乙酰紫草素、异丁酰紫草素、β,β’-二甲基丙烯酰阿卡宁、异戊酰紫草素含量范围分别为0.030%~0.52%、0.029%~0.43%、0.19%~2.02%、0.39%~1.30%。结论: 进口紫草性状外观形态和内部化学成分有一定关系,建立的含量测定方法简便、准确、重复性好,可为进口紫草药材多指标成分的质量评价和控制提供依据。
Objective:To compare the quality of 5 batches of imported Arnebiae Radix, provide a reference for the quality evaluation of imported Arnebiae Radix. Methods:The characteristics of five batches of imported Arnebiae Radix were compared. The contents of acetylshikonin, isobutyrylshikonin, β,β’- dimethylacrylalkannin, and isovalerylshikonin in five batches of imported Arnebiae Radix were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) performed on a Venusil MP C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm), with a mobile phase of acetonitrile-0.05% formic acid water (70 ∶ 30) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL · min-1, ultraviolet detection at 275 nm, and column temperature at 30 ℃. Results:There were significant differences in the characteristics of the five batches of imported Arnebiae Radix. Good linear relationships were observed for acetylshikonin, isobutyrylshikonin, β,β’- dimethylacrylalkannin, and isovalerylshikonin within the ranges of 0.2024-2.024 μg(r=1), 0.04072-0.4072 μg(r=0.9998), 0.2062-2.062 μg(r=1), 0.2678-2.678 μg(r=1), respectively. The average recovery rate were 101.2% to 104.1% with RSD<2.4%. The contents of acetylshikonin, isobutyrylshikonin, β,β’- dimethylacrylalkannin, and isovalerylshikonin in the five batches of imported Arnebiae Radix were 0.030%-0.52%, 0.029%-0.43%, 0.19%-2.02%, 0.39%-1.30%, respectively. Conclusion:There is a certain relationship between the appearance and internal chemical components of the imported Arnebiae Radix. The established content determination method is simple, accurate, and has good repeatability, which can provide a basis for the quality evaluation and control of multi-index components of imported Arnebiae Radix.
[1] 佚名. 神农本草经:卷二[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,1997:196.
[2] 中华人民共和国药典:一部[S].2020:355-356.
[3] 程敏,汤俊,李姗姗. 紫草萘醌类成分的药理活性及其定量分析方法研究进展[J].药学学报,2018,53
(12):2026-2039.
[4] 廖梅,吴凌凤,姜宏梁.药用紫草醌类化合物及其药理活性研究进展[J].天然产物研究与开发,2020,32:694-707.
[5] 张凡,王绾江,景慧玲. 紫草的现代药理研究及皮肤科中的应用[J].中医药导报,2020,26(9):168-172.
[6] 张文强. 新疆紫草的化学成分及抗炎活性研究[D].广州:南方医科大学,2022.
[7] 吴瑞崧,黄国顺,周恩超. 紫草治疗过敏性紫癜肾炎的临床应用及药理机制[J].中国医药导报,2024,21(31):57-60.
[8] 余风华,谭勇,屈莲. 新疆紫草的性状与显微鉴别[J].中药材,2013,36(12):1943-1944.
[9] 杨晓绒,徐丽萍,恩特马克· 布拉提白,等. 伊犁地区软紫草种群空间分布格局及根部性状分析[J].江西农业大学学报,2020,42(4):684-691.
[10] 徐海燕. 新疆软紫草属资源及其药材品质评价的研究[D].北京中医药大学,2021.
[11] 黄瑞,戴胜云,吴东雪,等. 新疆紫草野生品与栽培品的质量比较研究[J].药物分析杂志,2024,44(5):783-795.
[12] 连超杰,戴胜云,刘杰,等. 基于“辨色论质”的新疆紫草质量评价研究[J].药物分析杂志,2024,44(5):766-771.
[13] 马生军,耿阳,马露,等. 药用紫草研究进展[J].中国现代中药,2021,23(1):177-184.
[14] 黄瑞,戴胜云,吴东雪,等. 基于HPLC指纹图谱及多指标成分含量测定的紫草质量评价[J].药物分析杂志,2024,59(10):929-937.
[15] 廖梅. 高效液相色谱-质谱-多反应监测特征轮廓谱结合化学计量学对市售不同产地药用紫草的质量评价[J].安徽医药,2021,25(5):870-874.